Papers with model reliability

15 papers
Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Language Models to Input Perturbations (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: High-performance neural language models have achieved state-of-the-art results on a wide range of NLP tasks, but results for common benchmark datasets often do not reflect model reliability and robustness when applied to noisy, real-world data.
Approach: They propose to implement character-level and word-level perturbation methods to simulate scenarios in which input texts may be slightly noisy or different from the data distribution on which NLP systems were trained.
Outcome: The proposed methods simulate scenarios in which input texts may be slightly noisy or different from the data distribution on which NLP systems were trained.
Navigating the Shortcut Maze: A Comprehensive Analysis of Shortcut Learning in Text Classification by Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Language models (LMs) often rely on spurious correlations rather than causally relevant features to improve accuracy and generalizability.
Approach: They propose a benchmark that categorizes shortcuts into occurrence, style, and concept . they aim to explore the nuanced ways shortcuts influence the performance of LMs .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark categorizes shortcuts into occurrence, style, and concept . it systematically investigates models’ resilience and susceptibilities to sophisticated shortcuts .
Extracting Chemical-Protein Interactions via Calibrated Deep Neural Network and Self-training (2020.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Several natural language processing methods have been used to extract interactions between chemicals and proteins from biomedical text data.
Approach: They propose a method to extract chemical–protein interactions from biomedical text data . they use a pre-trained language-understanding model and calibration techniques to estimate uncertainty .
Outcome: The proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Biocreative VI ChemProt task while preserving higher calibration abilities.
The Craft of Selective Prediction: Towards Reliable Case Outcome Classification - An Empirical Study on European Court of Human Rights Cases (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing COC tasks prioritize high task performance over model reliability . however, large models exhibit overconfidence and Monte Carlo dropout methods produce reliable confidence estimates .
Approach: They conduct an empirical investigation into how various design choices affect the reliability of COC models within the framework of selective prediction.
Outcome: The proposed model is able to predict the outcome of a legal case based on the text of the case facts and is compared with other models using a pre-training corpus.
Unveiling Uncertainty: A Deep Dive into Calibration and Performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multimodal large language models combine visual and textual data for tasks like image captioning and visual question answering.
Approach: They propose temperature scaling and iterative prompt optimization to calibrate MLLMs and enhance model reliability.
Outcome: The proposed techniques improve MLLMs and improve model reliability.
How Many Ratings per Item are Necessary for Reliable Significance Testing? (2026.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for estimating model reliability are based on a few output responses per item.
Approach: They propose a method to determine whether an existing dataset has enough responses per item to assure reliable null hypothesis statistical testing.
Outcome: The proposed method can help researchers make better decisions about how to collect data for AI evaluation.
RCScore: Quantifying Response Consistency in Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current evaluations of large language models rely on a single instruction template, overlooking models’ sensitivity to instruction style.
Approach: They propose a multi-dimensional framework quantifying how instruction formulation affects model responses by transforming benchmark problems into multiple instruction styles.
Outcome: The proposed framework reveals that instruction style can shift accuracy by 16.7% points.
Rationales Are Not Silver Bullets: Measuring the Impact of Rationales on Model Performance and Reliability (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have shown that training language models with rationales augmentation is beneficial, but this view does not hold consistently.
Approach: They conduct comprehensive investigations to thoroughly inspect the impact of rationales on model performance and a novel perspective of model reliability.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms untrained models in several areas and provides informative regulations on the broad utilization of rationales.
CoME: An Unlearning-based Approach to Conflict-free Model Editing (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) often retain outdated or incorrect information from pre-training, which undermines their reliability.
Approach: They propose a conflict-free model editing framework that selectively removes outdated knowledge from LLMs to improve their accuracy and reliability.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves both editing accuracy and model reliability when applied to existing editing methods.
UBench: Benchmarking Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Multiple Choice Questions (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for benchmarking the uncertainty of large language models face challenges . existing methods require internal model access, additional training, or high computational costs .
Approach: They propose a new benchmark for evaluating the uncertainty of large language models based on confidence intervals . UBench encompasses 11,978 multiple choice questions spanning knowledge, language, understanding, and reasoning capabilities.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms existing methods for benchmarking the uncertainty of large language models.
Sowing the Wind, Reaping the Whirlwind: The Impact of Editing Language Models (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) face challenges in maintaining accuracy due to the dynamic nature of world knowledge.
Approach: They propose to use a benchmark dataset to investigate the effects of model edits on model safety metrics and guardrails.
Outcome: The proposed dataset sheds light on how the edits, impact the model’s safety metrics and guardrails.
Echoes of Agreement: Argument Driven Sycophancy in Large Language models (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluations of political biases in Large Language Models outline the high sensitivity to prompt formulation.
Approach: They investigate how argumentative prompts induce sycophantic behaviour in Large Language Models in a political context.
Outcome: The proposed model sycophancy is observed in single and multi-turn interactions and its intensity correlates with argument strength.
Spotting Out-of-Character Behavior: Atomic-Level Evaluation of Persona Fidelity in Open-Ended Generation (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation methods struggle to capture subtle inconsistencies in large language models.
Approach: They propose an atomic-level evaluation framework that quantifies persona fidelity at a finer granularity.
Outcome: The proposed framework detects inconsistencies that prior evaluation methods overlook . it captures subtle deviations that real users would encounter .
Detecting LLM Hallucination Through Layer-wise Information Deficiency: Analysis of Ambiguous Prompts and Unanswerable Questions (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) often generate confident yet inaccurate responses, introducing significant risks for deployment in safety-critical domains.
Approach: They propose a method to detect model hallucination by systematic analysis of information flow across model layers.
Outcome: The proposed approach improves model reliability by immediately integrating with universal LLMs without additional training or architectural modifications.
Decomposed Prompting Does Not Fix Knowledge Gaps, But Helps Models Say “I Don’t Know” (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models struggle to recognize their knowledge limits in closed-book question answering . disagreements between prompting regimes are indicative of potential errors, study finds .
Approach: They evaluate three task-equivalent prompting regimes: Direct, Assistive, Incremental . disagreements between prompting régimes provide a precise signal of internal uncertainty .
Outcome: The proposed decomposed prompting outperforms standard uncertainty baselines as an error detector.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations